<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pica Interactive &#187; Web Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.picainteractive.com/category/web_standards/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.picainteractive.com</link>
	<description>News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:42:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Web Standards and Search Engines</title>
		<link>http://blog.picainteractive.com/web-standards-and-search-engines.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.picainteractive.com/web-standards-and-search-engines.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sheri Bodnaruk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ngenmarketing.com/pica/web-standards-and-search-engines.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all want our websites to rank well in the search engines, but are<br />
keywords and keyword rich content enough? Do you know how your website was<br />
designed and produced? And how the source code was written to define and render<br />
your site on the browser? These are things you may want to find out before you<br />
start paying for pay per click advertising.</p>
<p>Here are 3 simple things you can ask when you are having your site built:</p>
<p><strong>1. Is Structural HyperText Markup Language (HTML) being used correctly?<o:p></o:p></strong></p>
<p>It is really that simple – using html as it was intended, as structural<br />
markup, keeping the presentation separate from the content. The HTML code<br />
should be structured according to web standards, using the proper &lt;h1&gt;,<br />
&lt;h2&gt; tags and wrapping paragraph structures in &lt;p&gt; tags. With<br />
proper semantic use of HTML the search engines can derive intended meaning from<br />
the content and correctly index your page. </p>
<p>Even if your site looks good in the browser it does not mean your site is using<br />
valid HTML code. While the browsers can still read non-compliant code, the<br />
search engine spiders have trouble with it. It all sounds so simple, but the sad<br />
reality is that as long as web browsers continue to accept invalid code it will<br />
always be a problem. That leaves it up to you to make sure that your site is as<br />
close to standards as possible.</p>
<p><strong>2. Does your site use Cascading Style Sheets (CSS)<o:p></o:p></strong></p>
<p>I know this was said before, but it is <em>so</em> important, keep the<br />
presentation separate from the structure, design separate from the data, the<br />
layout separate from the content. CSS controls the way your site looks and it<br />
is in a separate file so when the search engine spiders come to your site they<br />
get the meat not all the stuff that decorates the plate. </p>
<p><strong>3. Check your site in a validating tool<o:p></o:p></strong></p>
<p>Whether your website code is currently 100% compliant, or a few rules were<br />
broken in order to accommodate old browsers, it’s always good to know if your<br />
site is compliant. There is a great and free validation tool at the <a href="http://www.w3c.org/">World Wide Web Consortium</a> site that can validate your html code as well as your<br />
CSS. </p>
<p>There are also many other benefits besides SEO to using web standards:</p>
<p><strong>Easier to read the code</strong> &#8211; Since the design is separated from the<br />
structure it is much easier to hand the code off to other designers or<br />
developers for site maintenance.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p><strong>Valid code saves time finding<br />
bugs</strong> &#8211; A validation tool<br />
takes a web page and validates the code against the web standards recommended<br />
by the W3C. So instead of spending many frustrating hours trying to fix a<br />
problem in one browser a validation tool will quite often find the problem for<br />
you.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p><strong>Content is separate from the<br />
style </strong>- This makes it<br />
easier to create different style sheets for alternative browsers and devices,<br />
broadening your audience.<br />
<strong><br />
Web standards are forward compatible</strong> – When sites are designed using web<br />
standards it is more likely your site will continue to look as good as it<br />
should as newer browsers are released. </p>
<p>The money you spend in making sure your site is web standard compliant will save<br />
you money in pay per click costs as well as site maintenance. While there are<br />
many things to consider in marketing your site, this is one of the easiest and<br />
most important steps you can take to increase the success of your site over the<br />
long term.</p>
<p>Further reading: <a href="http://blog.picainteractive.com/blog/2007/03/programming_mat.html">Programming Matters for Search Engine Optimization</a>, <a href="http://www.digital-web.com/articles/building_to_standards/">The Dollars and Sense of Building to Standards</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.picainteractive.com/web-standards-and-search-engines.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
